[Dspforum] Lab 5 Question

[Joseph Haber]

All are fair game.

On 10/12/09, Alan Ding <ading1 at jhu.edu> wrote:
> Never mind, I should have realized the "mystery" numbers meant obtainable
> points for the problem.  Although, I was wondering if we are allowed to do
> anything and everything from the readings (including optimizations -o flags
> and disabling sym debug) for both parts of the lab.
>
>> The instructions also mentioned including compiler comments.  Are those
>> found in the .asm file?  Or just what's printed from compiler consultant?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alan Ding <alan33d at gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, October 12, 2009 5:24 pm
> Subject: [Dspforum] Lab 5 Question
> To: dspforum at echelonembedded.com
>
>
>> >= 1024 taps = 25, >= 800 taps = 20, >= 512 taps = 15, <512 taps = 12
>>
>> Sample rate not preserved : 0
>>
>> What do the requirements above mean (from Lab 5)?    Are the numbers after
>> the taps in microseconds?  If that's the case, wouldn't the first
>> requirement (25) fail to meet our 48kHz deadline?  I was also unsure what
>> "sample rate not preserved: 0" means.
>>
>> The instructions also mentioned including compiler comments.  Are those
>> found in the .asm file?  Or just what's printed from compiler consultant?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Alan Ding
>> Master of Sci, Electrical Engineering
>> Johns Hopkins University
>>
>> Email: alan33d at gmail.com
>> Contact #: 4844593290
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dspforum mailing list
>> Dspforum at echelonembedded.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dspforum mailing list
> Dspforum at echelonembedded.com
> http://echelonembedded.com/mailman/listinfo/dspforum_echelonembedded.com
>